Saturday, March 18, 2006

Konop paying students to aid campaign effort

As a visiting professor at the University of Toledo's law school, I wonder if there may be some conflict of interest by Mr. Konop in recruiting college students from the University of Toledo's College Democrats?

Are these College Democrats being recruited enrolled in law courses that Mr. Konop is teaching at the university? Are there non-democrat students (or even democrat students who do not support Ben Konop) enrolled in his courses as well? If so, is impartial and objective grading occurring or are students who may take a different view point then that of Mr. Konop receiving a lesser grade?

Before everyone goes off on me, I am not suggesting that Mr. Konop is intentionally or with malice skewing grades, merely pointing out that there may be a perception of conflict of interest. For instance, any college professor who is able to persuade a student to support his ideas may percieve that support as a demostration (to a degree) that they understand his beliefs and therefore have learned from his professes. There may then be a subconscious inclination on the part of the professor to grade these students based on those understandings . Conversely, a student who fails to jump on the professors bandwagon may reflect in the mind of the professor a misunderstanding or non-comprehension of his teachings and therefore results in a lesser grade, warranted or not.

I can imagine a "C" student thinking that he can bump his grade to a "B" just by showing support for their teacher in a political campaign and get $8.00 an hour to boot. Party Money!

It is not my intention in this posting to question Mr. Konops qualifications for a seat on the LCC. I have read some of his positions and even agree with some of them to an extent. Nor am I questioning the rights of a candidate to pay canvassers for campaign expenses they may accumulate; I am questioning the pool of recruits any College Professor who is running for public office may pull from. In this case I do not think it appropraite to solicite canvassers from a student body which may be enrolled in one of his classes.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

The way I understood this is was done thru the UT College Dems, quite a few of whom I've had the opportunity to meet. Very few of them are law students or Ben's students. I think to imply as Copeland does in the Blade article that they are not committed is kind of an insult. It's pretty much a given if you are using younger volunteers they cannot afford to personally cover expenses such as gas and any reduction in work hours to volunteer would create hardship for many of them.

Ben is demonstrating he wants young people involved in the process rather than relying on the regular political system that realistically has created many of the problems we have right now in this area. He's also acknowledging that he realizes he would be expecting them to make a financial sacrifice if they were not paid. I don't see anything wrong with that. Nor do I believe knowing this organization the way I do that any person that volunteers paid or unpaid is going to go out there just for the money, quite a few of them believe in his ideas and share his creative energy.

Hooda Thunkit (Dave Zawodny) said...

Ben's activities look innocent as does the activity of his supporters, but the question IS valid, nonetheless.

However, unless someone has observed or heard something that merits further scrutiny, this is a red herring issue.